From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 14:49:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D235D28E; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC65B204A; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C5843BA8; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:48:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53F0C0BC.2000902@marino.st> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:48:28 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger , Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r365003 - head/devel/elfsh/files References: <201408151704.s7FH4f4W071527@svn.freebsd.org> <20140816164551.GA86642@FreeBSD.org> <53EF9469.3070704@gmx.de> <20140817091822.GA51054@FreeBSD.org> <7012BDCA-0949-4A7F-A017-D8F76476F8B9@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <7012BDCA-0949-4A7F-A017-D8F76476F8B9@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: olli hauer , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:49:04 -0000 On 8/17/2014 16:29, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 17 Aug, 2014, at 5:18, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 07:27:05PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >>> There are 1182 ports with an '_' in the name and I think reading a patch name >>> patch-mod_foo__main.c is easier to read then >>> patch-mod_foo_main.c >>> patch-mod_foo-main.c >>> patch-mod_foo--main.c >>> patch-mod_foo+main.c >> >> Apparently there *are* people who don't see the ugliness of __! > > More than one. > patch-mod_foo__main.c is too simple. Try: patch-alpha__bravo__charlie__delta-echo__foxtrot__golf__hotel__india_juliet.cpp then 20 more of those in the same directory. Very ugly. eye of the beholder I guess.