Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:32:43 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: syslog-ng's category (see PR 18187) Message-ID: <20000425003243.C445@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004250022310.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from chuckr@picnic.mat.net on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 12:26:54AM -0400 References: <20000425001747.B445@argon.blackdawn.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004250022310.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 12:26:54AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > Noting that both are reasonable answers, I would say that since it's only > a user of security, and doesn't either provide security to other services > or audits (only use security in providing it's own service) I would stick > it into sysutils. I would, too. But I'm going to gather opinions before I make a decision. So far the favor seems to be sysutils. Thanks for your opinion. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000425003243.C445>