From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 17 06:32:56 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id GAA11183 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 06:32:56 -0800 Received: from hda.com (hda.com [199.232.40.182]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA11177 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 06:32:54 -0800 Received: (dufault@localhost) by hda.com (8.6.9/8.3) id JAA22356; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 09:31:29 -0500 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199502171431.JAA22356@hda.com> Subject: config(8) and conflicts To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Date: Fri, 17 Feb 1995 09:31:28 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 399 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Config doesn't check for conflicts, even when it can. Should it? I've started putting in checks so that you can't config something like: > disk sd2 at scbus0 target 3 > disk sd2 at scbus1 target 3 but is this the right thing? -- Peter Dufault Real Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267