From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 15:26:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB2516A4CE; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50B143D2F; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:26:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from xeon (xeon.unixathome.org [192.168.0.18]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5623D31; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:26:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:26:47 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille X-X-Sender: dan@xeon.unixathome.org To: "Brandon D. Valentine" In-Reply-To: <20040304205210.GJ490@geekpunk.net> Message-ID: <20040304182602.S31161@xeon.unixathome.org> References: <20040303160340.700C5170D4@www.wcborstel.nl> <20040304205210.GJ490@geekpunk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Jorn Argelo cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 23:26:48 -0000 On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote: > > > > I've been on the question list for some time, and I have noticed that > > many people do not know how to get sound support up and running in > > FreeBSD 5.X. I know that re-compiling the kernel is easy enough, but > > there are still people not willing to do so, as I have noticed on the > > list. Therefor I thought it might be an idea to put sound support in the > > GENERIC kernel configuration, so that newbies will no longer find > > themselves stuck with that. > > If they'd read pcm(4) they'd know how to get sound support up and > running without recompiling their kernel. Is there something wrong with > requiring that a new user bother to read the documentation? They would first have to know to read man pcm(4). -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/