From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug 26 12:47:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA03148
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 12:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA03134
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 12:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.8.6/8.7.3) id WAA03923; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 22:47:30 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 22:47:30 +0300 (EEST)
Message-Id: <199708261947.WAA03923@silver.sms.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: IPv6
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15p7 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  I'll accept any flames I get for posting directly here but since my
questions on -questions have ended without generating a horde nor a
single reply I thought I'll dare to do this anyway :-/

  So the question is if there are plans to integrate IPv6 into current
anytime soon? It seems that there is fairly functional implementation
from INRIA which seems to fall out-of-sync even with 2.2-STABLE quite
frequently so I would guess coordinating efforts and checking the code
or some other code in would be helpful for us users and developers
alike.

Pete