From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 16:02:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2434216A4C1 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from strangelove.glynjones.com (63-212-172-50.glynjones.com [63.212.172.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C84043F75 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:02:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave-lists@glynjones.com) Received: from [63.208.110.136] (helo=NTWEB) by strangelove.glynjones.com with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pFV5-000EjE-Jz; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:02:51 -0700 Message-ID: <01d601c366a6$0b8fe5d0$886ed03f@glynjones.com> From: "Dave Byrne" To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" References: <009e01c3669b$b9725df0$886ed03f@glynjones.com> <20030819221442.GA8196@wombat.localnet> <016601c366a1$06f393a0$886ed03f@glynjones.com> <1061333045.1842.8.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:03:03 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: Michael Edenfield cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOLD_PKGS not working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:02:53 -0000 Yep thats it. when portversion is run with the -c option the ouput is commented out for the linux port (and signified by [held]) but just running portversion with no options masks nothing. a little bit of a quirk but good to know. Thanks for the help Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: "Dave Byrne" Cc: "Michael Edenfield" ; Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: Re: HOLD_PKGS not working? > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:27, Dave Byrne wrote: > > However none of the above are masking linux_base and linux-sun-jdk from > > portversion. > > I think the comment is wrong; I've held packages with HOLD_PKGS and > while portupgrade honors it, portversion does not. (Although... does > portversion perhaps only honor it when run with the -c option?) > > -- > brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com > system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH > URGENT! E-xpedient nuked APK subdomains; kf8nh.apk.net is DEAD. Sorry. > >