From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Mar  6  7:30:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913E737B71E
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Mar 2001 07:30:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f26FU4047861;
	Tue, 6 Mar 2001 07:30:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 07:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200103061530.f26FU4047861@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Subject: Re: bin/25361: dump(8) command segfaults
Reply-To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/25361; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>,
	FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/25361: dump(8) command segfaults
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 07:25:57 -0800 (PST)

 -current or -stable?
 
 
 On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 
 > Matthew Jacob:
 > > 
 > > Both the -stable and -current with kernels and userland later than February 26
 > > do not show this problem.
 > 
 > Sorry, but I'm running kernel and userland from March 4, and this
 > is *not* resolved.
 > 
 > -- 
 > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de
 > 
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message