From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 23 16:59:38 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C553816A404
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:59:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8122C13C48D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:59:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.4])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1HKdPc-000KdY-UG; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:36:49 +0300
Message-ID: <45DF1803.7030106@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:36:19 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070124)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <20070205001114.b4f77f86.bsd-unix@earthlink.net>
	<45C6EE26.9010909@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <45C6EE26.9010909@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: w45kl9@charter.net, Randy Pratt <bsd-unix@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:59:38 -0000

Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Randy Pratt wrote:
>> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles
>> dependencies in updating a port to a new version.  In quite a few
>> cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were
>> originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file.  I'll use the "netpbm"
> 
> Well, I have an idea about this I should check.
> 

Sorry I did not answer for a long time. I have no time for portupgrade
till today. I've found the big and fix it in portupgrade-devel (version
2.2.4). It would be great if you test it (anyone who want are welcome).

You can follow the steps to upgrade:

portupgrade -fo ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade
pkgdb -L (it fixes lost dependencies. you could want to backup your
/var/db/pkg to compare afterwards)
pkgdb -F

... and work as usualy

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.