From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Aug 14 18:56:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from synology.com (dns1.synology.com [202.173.37.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB55937B406 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:56:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rexluo@synology.com) Received: from synology.com (IDENT:nobody@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by synology.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA05121; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:57:22 +0800 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:57:22 +0800 Message-Id: <200108150157.JAA05121@synology.com> To: mjacob@feral.com, Matthew Jacob , Rex Luo Subject: Re: Question about SCSI target mode codes From: Rex Luo X-Mailer: TWIG Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have reviewed the codes, and understand how it going: XPT_ACCEPT_TARGET_IO ccb would be remove from work_queue in targstart(), and wait for XPT_CONT_TARGET_IO ccb to callback in targdone(). All requests return to initiator are done by XPT_ACCEPT_TARGET_IO ccb to sim device without exception, no matter simple command or complicated command. Anyway, thanks for your information! -Rex Matthew Jacob said: > > > My question is does sim device distinguish 2 different XPT_ACCEPT_TARGET_IO > > behaviours? > > > No. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message > -- Rex Luo Tel : 886-2-25521814 Ext. 824 Fax : 886-2-25521824 e-mail : rexluo@synology.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message