From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 14 13:56:32 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68FE106566B
	for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCFD8FC0C
	for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Cc:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type;
	bh=+WL2aHKwKbO+9IRJFOxdGBCZwqNRKZ9MarspuUHkvTY=; 
	b=aNVGic2yl87HvnMO/oFFpR0lIMA5hY/NmbGGOS9Ks+K7er4z+1Ja5gDK0B8rTzWuJ7a/Xsg/F+B63PYifcGsCx2JccjbaqIznebkBQOYacYh8an5GrZh0TMQZ3HnsGvL;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
	id 1T1Hbj-000BTT-2Y; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:56:31 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1344952585-41577-41576/5/63; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:25
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net>
	<20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org>
	<69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net>
	<20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org>
	<C29A4285-989C-4F3F-BE5D-B92959E0BD92@ramattack.net>
	<op.wit1wntv34t2sn@me-pc> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net>
	<op.wixrbfzh34t2sn@localhost>
	<D530A3A1-A370-47E7-B4A5-041B39DDB677@ramattack.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:56:25 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wi1acbvj34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <D530A3A1-A370-47E7-B4A5-041B39DDB677@ramattack.net>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
	<freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
	<mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
	<mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:32 -0000

On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:00:25 -0500, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre  
<egoitz@ramattack.net> wrote:

> I suppose should be different ports... Xenstore is a Xen system  
> capability but the Citrix rules for working with the xapi and xencenter  
> are just for Citrix's Xen systems... You don't need them if you're  
> virtualizing in a Gentoo dom0 for example... I'll create a different  
> port for it in September/October... Which of course install by  
> dependency xen-tools's port... But should not be the same port.

The xen-tools should include this work. It has nothing to do with what  
dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enable it  
in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if  
necessary. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely  
separate port.