From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 19 08:57:43 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE528B1208E
 for <freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF5CB10FF;
 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1asRTd-000PVv-Qs; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:57:45 +0300
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:57:45 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)
Message-ID: <20160419085745.GF4841@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org>
 <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com>
 <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <5715DD2E.903@freebsd.org>
 <20160419073117.GG1554@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160419083911.GG6614@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160419084129.GI1554@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160419084129.GI1554@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:57:44 -0000

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:41:29AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:39:11AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:31:17AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > We've managed to keep this disease out of BSD since I started to do it in
> > > > 1990. First we laughed/fumed at Sun's Solaris when they unbundled the
> > > > compiler. then we fumed at xorg when hey took a useful package and made 190
> > > > odd packages out of it. Please don't force this on us!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > What isn't clear about the *numerous* statements that no one is being
> > > *forced* to use packaged base?
> > 
> > Because nowhere present roadmap about co-existing packaged base and
> > traditionsl install.
> > Because nowhere present roadmap of packaged base future.
> > Because package base is show-stoper for 11.0 relese -- this is read as
> > "11.0 switch to package base".
> > 
> 
> And nowhere did it say "buildworld/buildkernel would no longer work."

buildworld/builkernel is requrement for `make packages`.
I am expect of removing installworld/installkernel.
Yes, I am don read about this. But in IT I am need to read between the
lines.
Also, installkernel broken in 10.x for multiple kernels and not planed
to fix. Why I need to expect different to this?