Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:35:10 -0400 From: "Michael C. Cambria" <mcc@fid4.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VOIP Message-ID: <412698BE.1080200@fid4.com> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040820184254.0263e440@mail.newspace.net.br> References: <002301c48760$54c9d4a0$fbb4a741@cedata.net> <6.1.2.0.2.20040820184254.0263e440@mail.newspace.net.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Antonio Torres wrote: > At 06:22 21/8/2004, you wrote: > >> Has anybody found a VoIP solution for FreeBSD that works? >> >> I looked at the asterisk product, but that doesn't seem to do it >> and the ports have been marked as banned. >> >> Any info would be appreciated. >> ... > > > /usr/ports/net/gatekeeper > > works fine for a gatekeeper on FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x > > I have a system runing gatekeeper interfacing a 3Com NBX and several "IP > Phones" (hardware and software: Planet IP-100, Netmeeting, Openphone) On FreeBSD 4.10-Stable, I've used gatekeeper for ohphone/openphone, currently use SER and started playing with Asterisk to free up the RH90 system. I have kphone running from ports as well (but needed a slight source code change to startup for me.) Versions: ser currently is 0.8.12, asterisk is 0.9.0_1 and gatekeeper is/was 2.0.5_2. SER is fantastic, and is well supported. I've stopped using gatekeeper since leaving Avaya, as I no longer have a need to touch H.323 anymore. From the comment above, it looks like it still works just fine. From what I read, there is a lot of work going on for Asterisk on BSD. There is a Asterisk-BSD mailing list available if you are interested. See http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd for details. SER & * work together just fine. I use * for my PSTN-GW ("media gateway"), but currently on RH90 until I have the time to migrate to BSD. I expect no problems. (If I had a free PCI slot, this would already be done.) MikeC
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412698BE.1080200>