From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul  1 21:57:25 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D00C16A421
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 21:57:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andrit@ukr.net)
Received: from kitty.ukr.net (kitty.ukr.net [212.42.65.67])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE2043D48
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 21:57:24 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andrit@ukr.net)
Received: from [80.84.191.150] (helo=ertpc)
	by kitty.ukr.net with smtp ID 1DoTVa-0009Ob-E7
	for hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:57:23 +0300
Message-ID: <00ad01c57e87$d417ee30$2d931bd9@ertpc>
From: "Andriy Tkachuk" <andrit@ukr.net>
To: <hackers@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:55:46 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Cc: 
Subject: Re: hot path optimizations in uma_zalloc() & uma_zfree()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:57:25 -0000


> if one will decide to commit first optimization (about buckets),
> then there must some adjustments be made also
> regarding correct statistics gathering.

It seems that all is fine with statistics,
i mistook.