From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 27 14:13:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27CF16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:13:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5A543D5C for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerarra@tin.it) Received: from ims3a.cp.tin.it (192.168.70.103) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.0.027) id 423846490048D0FE for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:12:58 +0200 Received: from [192.168.70.227] by ims3a.cp.tin.it with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:12:57 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:12:57 +0100 Message-ID: <420008450006DC4F@ims3a.cp.tin.it> In-Reply-To: <20050327134044.GM78512@silverwraith.com> From: gerarra@tin.it To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 82.57.93.209 Subject: Re: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:13:02 -0000 > >Without intending to start any compiler holy wars, what benefits does >ICC provide over GCC for the end user? > ICC would provide better low level code (remind: Intel C Compiler. It wou= ld mean better performance). rookie