From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 29 22:27:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741A516A421 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outG.internet-mail-service.net (outG.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F12613C481 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:22:09 -0700 X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19FD12683E; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <472551FE.3020703@elischer.org> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:22:38 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Paulo References: <47241E9C.7000605@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: learned something about coretemp X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:27:15 -0000 Rui Paulo wrote: > On 10/28/07, Julian Elischer wrote: >> never kldload it on an 8 year old system. >> >> *bewm* >> >> I presume that my 8 YO inspiron 7500 doesn't have whatever is needed, >> but, "*Bewm*" is probably a less than optimal reaction. > > That has been reported in the past. It's Intel's fault, not ours. > The spec says that if you issue a CPUID you should be able to tell if > the CPU has the temperature sensors regardless of the CPU model, but > on old systems these CPUID call "returns true". maybe we should just return true to the top layer if it's a 686 or newer (or something). >