From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 6 15:30:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B712F16A4CE for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.mcmanis.com (www.mcmanis.com [66.125.189.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62C6443D1D for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:30:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cmcmanis@mcmanis.com) Received: (qmail 14872 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2004 23:40:06 -0000 Received: from home.mcmanis.com (HELO manowar.mcmanis.com) (66.125.189.30) by www.mcmanis.com with SMTP; 6 Mar 2004 23:40:06 -0000 Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20040306153313.02786e48@66.125.189.29> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:34:52 -0800 To: "Raymond Wiegand" , FreeBSD-Questions@Freebsd.org From: Chuck McManis In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: FreeBsd and SCO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 23:30:58 -0000 Unlike the GPL, the BSD license has already been litigated (see AT&T vs The Regents), there is quite a bit of clarity around the legality of the BSD source. --Chuck At 03:06 PM 3/6/2004, Raymond Wiegand wrote: >Hi > I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was > wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be > going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all based on their kernal or > what every they claim is theirs property. > > I would like to know before i switch all my system over (2) to Unix