Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 08:46:57 -0500 (EST) From: Eric Wayte <ewayte@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port 1243 scans Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.4.10.9911080841250.12329-100000@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991108222201.2364B-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A complete list of assigned port numbers can be found at: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1700.html ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers It appears that 1243 is unassigned. Good luck, Eric Wayte, DBA Univ. of Central Florida ewayte@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Ian Smith wrote: > Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 22:43:48 +1100 (EST) > From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> > To: security@freebsd.org > Subject: Port 1243 scans > > Hi folks, > > The last two days we've had several attempted scans of tcp port 1243 > from two systems in our locality, presumably over our /26 subnet. This > seems to be their only port of interest; I only noticed it due to their > having scanned unallocated addresses to which ipfw logs access attempts. > > What are they looking for? Is this one of these Netbus/BO things? We do > have Windoze boxes on the LAN, as some with local knowledge would know; > I guess I'll have to bolt down ports that wouldn't worry freebsd boxes. > > To save asking more silly questions, is there a list of ports used by > various nasties somewhere out there (not in /etc/services, obviously). > > If it matters, this is a 2.2.6-RELEASE box with known security fixes, > soon to be upgraded to 3.3, once the airmail arrives. > > Cheers, Ian > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.4.10.9911080841250.12329-100000>