From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jan 9 14:55:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtprch1.nortel.com (smtprch1.nortelnetworks.com [192.135.215.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BBE14E87 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 14:55:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from atrens@nortelnetworks.com) Received: from zmers013 by smtprch1.nortel.com; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 16:54:32 -0600 Received: from hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com by zmers013; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 17:54:18 -0500 Received: from hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com (hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com [47.196.31.114]) by hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA03869 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 18:02:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 18:02:13 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew Atrens" X-Sender: atrens@hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com Reply-To: "Andrew Atrens" To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD slags linux (?) In-Reply-To: <200001092048.VAA42075@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Oliver has a point here - > > "LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless" > > That signature _hurts_ the FreeBSD project. Whether you like > it or not, or whether I like it or not, that's not the point. It seems to me the name you have picked as a handle is just one of convenience. Why not change it to something that doesn't make it sound like you represent the project? Surely someone of your intelligence could come up with something a bit more original? Andrew. -- +-- | Andrew Atrens Nortel Networks, Ottawa, Canada. | | All opinions expressed are my own, not those of any employer. | --+ Heller's Law: The first myth of management is that it exists. Johnson's Corollary: Nobody really knows what is going on anywhere within the organization. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message