From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:28:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B17316A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:28:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [80.86.187.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8357543D31 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 55565 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 17:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kartoffel.salatschuessel.net) (80.86.187.43) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 17:27:55 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:28:20 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040926192820.3dc88d3a.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <20040926190709.251f1689.lehmann@ans-netz.de> References: <20040926190709.251f1689.lehmann@ans-netz.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems with ANA-6944A + 5.3-BETA + IRQ sharing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:28:23 -0000 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > It doesn't seem to happen with a cable attached to de0. So I guess it's > a problem with irq sharing? Ok.. I accessed a 50Mb file now over nfs with de0... 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1179 ttl=64 time=0.627 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1180 ttl=64 time=0.637 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1181 ttl=64 time=0.607 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1182 ttl=64 time=1011.859 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1183 ttl=64 time=1008.330 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1184 ttl=64 time=1010.892 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1185 ttl=64 time=1010.967 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1186 ttl=64 time=1010.465 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1187 ttl=64 time=1010.717 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.21: icmp_seq=1188 ttl=64 time=1010.826 ms So - it's the driver, the card, or the board. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/