Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:07:37 +0100 From: PingBrother Networking <sales1@pingbrother.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: What breed of a dog can text you? Message-ID: <E1TvzUt-0002F0-SB@mikroweb.hu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=
=
=
<P style=3D"PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING=
-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; font-size:14px><A style=3D"COLOR: #c33200" h=
ref=3D"http://www.pingbrother.com">;
=
=
is watching
your devices
=
- MONITORING
- CONTROL
- WATCHDOG
=
=
=
What breed of a dog can text you? =
=85a PingBrother watchdog. =
Easy!
Check out our video demo to see how smart our watchdog device is.
=
=
=
=
What is PingBrother? Click to play.
=
=
Click here for the full length video demo.
=
Order your sample now at sales@pingbrother.com
=
=
EPIW 104 for 109 EUR (list price) =
EPIW 104P for 135 EUR (list price
For quantity based discount prices please see our =
product comparison table with prices: USD / EUR. =
For more information on our products and services please visit our website:
=
www.pingbrother.com
=
subscribe unsubscribe
=
=
=
=
=
=
PingBrother is
=
a 4 port industrial 10/100 passive POE ethernet switch and IP watchdog wit=
h built in web based GUI. It is an intelligent device, which watches a lot=
of qualities of its environment, such as input voltage, temperature, curre=
nt consumption of the connected POE devices, operability of any network dev=
ices (ping, http availability), water leakage or condensation.
=
It gives a user defined response, for example turns off /on or reset the p=
ower of the POE ethernet ports, controls any connected device by its relay =
contact, and/or sends an email.
PingBrother can work on nearly any low voltage (8-56V DC or 9-42V AC), and =
can distribute its input power to any kind of connected standard or non sta=
ndard POE devices (PD).
=
PingBrother can manage other, non-IP devices through the relay contacts co=
nnected to the terminal blocks. =
=
=20
From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:54:28 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AE7D72
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C90E59
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-net@m.gmane.org>) id 1Tw9aq-0006tt-MV
for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0100
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0100
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: VMware vmxnet2 driver
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:12 +0100
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <kdb9ki$vkb$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <975792706.137.1358145587551.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
<1873789450.140.1358145734760.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:14.0) Gecko/20120812 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To: <1873789450.140.1358145734760.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:28 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 14/01/2013 07:42, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
> Any testing or performance data is welcome. For bulk TCP transfers, if_=
vic
> will tend to be faster than em (~1/2 a magnitude) due to TSO, but I don=
't
> think that warrants merging into HEAD yet.
Considering that from your description the current situation is:
* The driver isn't *worse* than either em or the "official" VMWare
driver (right?)
* There is currently no vmxnet driver at all in HEAD
=2E.. I don't think including the driver will harm anyone or anything, bu=
t
it may make things a bit simpler when configuring VMs.
--------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlD5KdUACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSzUHACfWj86vfhQAXTk4dBM/tnOTKcM
P/0AniNlCrll9WeIJEqEtT9a21GBIzOY
=bdxn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1TvzUt-0002F0-SB>