Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:07:37 +0100 From: PingBrother Networking <sales1@pingbrother.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: What breed of a dog can text you? Message-ID: <E1TvzUt-0002F0-SB@mikroweb.hu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<P style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; font-size:14px><A style="COLOR: #c33200" href="http://www.pingbrother.com">;
is watching
your devices
- MONITORING
- CONTROL
- WATCHDOG
What breed of a dog can text you?
…a PingBrother watchdog.
Easy!
Check out our video demo to see how smart our watchdog device is.
What is PingBrother? Click to play.
Click here for the full length video demo.
Order your sample now at sales@pingbrother.com
EPIW 104 for 109 EUR (list price)
EPIW 104P for 135 EUR (list price
For quantity based discount prices please see our
product comparison table with prices: USD / EUR.
For more information on our products and services please visit our website:
www.pingbrother.com
subscribe unsubscribe
PingBrother is
a 4 port industrial 10/100 passive POE ethernet switch and IP watchdog with built in web based GUI. It is an intelligent device, which watches a lot of qualities of its environment, such as input voltage, temperature, current consumption of the connected POE devices, operability of any network devices (ping, http availability), water leakage or condensation.
It gives a user defined response, for example turns off /on or reset the power of the POE ethernet ports, controls any connected device by its relay contact, and/or sends an email.
PingBrother can work on nearly any low voltage (8-56V DC or 9-42V AC), and can distribute its input power to any kind of connected standard or non standard POE devices (PD).
PingBrother can manage other, non-IP devices through the relay contacts connected to the terminal blocks.
From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:54:28 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AE7D72
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C90E59
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-net@m.gmane.org>) id 1Tw9aq-0006tt-MV
for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0100
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0100
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: VMware vmxnet2 driver
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:54:12 +0100
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <kdb9ki$vkb$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <975792706.137.1358145587551.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
<1873789450.140.1358145734760.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:14.0) Gecko/20120812 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To: <1873789450.140.1358145734760.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:28 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 14/01/2013 07:42, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
> Any testing or performance data is welcome. For bulk TCP transfers, if_vic
> will tend to be faster than em (~1/2 a magnitude) due to TSO, but I don't
> think that warrants merging into HEAD yet.
Considering that from your description the current situation is:
* The driver isn't *worse* than either em or the "official" VMWare
driver (right?)
* There is currently no vmxnet driver at all in HEAD
... I don't think including the driver will harm anyone or anything, but
it may make things a bit simpler when configuring VMs.
--------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlD5KdUACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSzUHACfWj86vfhQAXTk4dBM/tnOTKcM
P/0AniNlCrll9WeIJEqEtT9a21GBIzOY
½xn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig24C4E56464DCB29C62455C42--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1TvzUt-0002F0-SB>