From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 23:05:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD5616A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from flake.decibel.org (flake.decibel.org [66.143.173.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C8B43D31 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:05:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from decibel@decibel.org) Received: by flake.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B40BE1C910; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:05:27 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:05:27 -0600 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050130230527.GR64304@decibel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:11:12 +0000 Subject: Automated performance testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:05:30 -0000 With all the discussion of performance testing between 4.11, 5.3, and Linux, would it be useful to make performance testing part of the automated testing that already occurs (via tinderbox, iirc). Doing so might make it easier to detect performance impacting changes, as well as making performance testing easier in general. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"