From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 4 23:35:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5771065672; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gautherot.net) Received: from mail-pz0-f201.google.com (mail-pz0-f201.google.com [209.85.222.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189448FC12; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk39 with SMTP id 39so551689pzk.15 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:35:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.131.6 with SMTP id i6mr535620wfn.338.1254699323092; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:35:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091005.055122.1024833258536770135.chat95@mac.com> References: <20090921191509.GA55401@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20091004003452.GA55656@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <20091005.055122.1024833258536770135.chat95@mac.com> From: Olivier Gautherot Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:35:03 -0400 Message-ID: To: Maho NAKATA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, miwi@freebsd.org, avg@icyb.net.ua, mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org, freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, sfourman@gmail.com Subject: Re: Problem building Openoffice 3.1.1 at -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:35:24 -0000 Hi Maho Nakata, First of all, thanks for all your good work - I've been your faithful "customer" for several years already and really appreciate your dedication. > It sounds like OOO is designed to be compiled on a fresh system: I > > reformated a disk yesterday and the compilation of OOO just finished > > successfully. I loaded 8.0-RC1. > > > > As a matter of fact, I used the bundled modules - it takes longer but > seems > > to be a bit more stable. > > Hi, Olivier Gautherot > > thanks for your e-mail. this is just a maintaing issue. > if you provide some human resources I'm very happy to use > python from ports tree instead. > I'll have to reissue the compilation in the data partition since I already started using the necessary space. I'll let you know. Serious problem may be that when some cws (child work space, smallest > unit of development) wrt python is introduced, or when ports > python is updated. Then there may be a conflict, and I'd like > to ask you to fix it. Usually very easy, but sometimes very hard. > >From my past experience, I tend to use the ports as released and do not update the ports tree. The few times I did were tough experiences, usually ending with a complete reinstall... :-S So I'm an easy customer on the ports. System upgrades usually end up in a backup and start from scratch (which was a real exercise on a VIA motherboard). So I may be somewhat atypical... I'll let you know the results. Cheers -- Olivier Gautherot olivier@gautherot.net Cel:+56 98 730 9361 www.gautherot.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ogautherot