From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 12 06:37:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74124E8; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 06:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7D61903; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 06:37:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=keEnVymKkDs20Vsr388DT9PkX1iCuFoNsSJ7bg7SVdc=; b=fIEAiWbzIJXw2WJgL/Y2MkTzPbJ9VK0ruFk6Ki6rY1H6ycGYWQ2zDySV58RRmZ0vppnotsje3fhESWukLmT+Sn5dbm08xn5BAcmkn596BjRTC9DDAPyggOjNiLuW+lyCRdGKpWkyscEp44IqkKL+/Zh+mAiMFSToVy6ORSwtut8=; Received: from [120.172.226.147] (port=13824 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W2EfM-002coz-Nf; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:37:01 -0700 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:36:47 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Thomas Mueller" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC5 Now Available Message-ID: <20140112143647.1861eded@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <455991.85149.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <20140109161818.GK64543@glenbarber.us> <20140110114102.692560fe@X220.alogt.com> <20140110064658.GM64543@glenbarber.us> <294911.64845.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20140110131910.GP64543@glenbarber.us> <527364.37701.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <455991.85149.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Glen Barber , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 06:37:02 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:20:12 +0000 (UTC) "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Thomas Mueller > wrote: > > > I don't think I have yet built hal and dbus on 10-prerelease or > 11-HEAD. > > Subversion was the first big thing, so I would not have to use the > NetBSD-current amd64 USB-stick installation to update FreeBSD src, > doc and ports trees. > > I have a FreeBSD 10-prerelease i386 USB 3.0 stick installation, was > wondering if I might do better with 11-HEAD. USB-stick installation > is useful for portability among more than one computer, and to have > utilities like gdisk and subversion, and run fsck when needed on > hard-drive installation. Also, I will want to build wine. > > I also am trying to decide which is stabler between 10-prerelease and > 11-HEAD. I would suggest to stick with 10 if your hardware allows. I was since June 2012 on 10. As the developers were testing and publishing new code, it was difficult from time to time. Of course, if you can afford the difficult times or have new hardware, take 11. If not, stay with 10. Of course, this is also true if you simply want to help the developers. Erich