From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jun 21 12:11:58 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17619
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 12:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ocean.campus.luth.se (ocean.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.116])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17614
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 12:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se)
Received: (from karpen@localhost)
	by ocean.campus.luth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA27557;
	Sun, 21 Jun 1998 21:08:51 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from karpen)
From: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se>
Message-Id: <199806211908.VAA27557@ocean.campus.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Here is what I promised :-)
In-Reply-To: <199806211739.MAA07603@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at "Jun 21, 98 12:39:54 pm"
To: dyson@iquest.net
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 21:08:51 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: mark@vmunix.com, dyson@iquest.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

According to John S. Dyson:
> I am slightly suspicious of certain LL performance issues, but
> those often can be mitigated by specialization of code sequences
> (micro-optimization.)  There are also aspects of the kernel
> structure that are so different (but potentially much more
> cache conserving) that it is really hard to compare non-scaled LL
> and scaled LL behavior yet.

Short question: What does LL mean? :-)

  /Mikael

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message