From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 20:02:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3D916A4D0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A89D43FEC for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:02:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 30691 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 04:02:54 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 04:02:54 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:02:52 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20031110.170151.81945639.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20031110215128.F6320@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200311102359.hAANx2xu023566@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> <20031110.170151.81945639.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: sam@errno.com cc: hsu@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:02:57 -0000 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200311102359.hAANx2xu023566@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> > Jeffrey Hsu writes: > : Are you kidding me? Or do you really not understand why it's not > : Giant-free ready yet? > > While it may be obvious to you, it seems that a sentence or two about > how it isn't giant-free would be useful. > > Warner If I'm not mistaken, syncache_timer calls syncache_respond, which then goes and interacts with the routing table and ip stack. Along with the rest of the non-locked code, it sure looks like it's not-MPSAFE to me. It seems "obvious" that the code isn't giant-free, given that there are no locking assertions in it whatsoever. Mike "Silby" Silbersack