From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 31 05:01:41 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3319E16A41F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:01:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from decibel@decibel.org)
Received: from flake.decibel.org (flake.decibel.org [67.100.216.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38A443D46
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:01:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from decibel@decibel.org)
Received: by flake.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 09D75152BB; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:01:37 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:01:37 -0500
From: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>
To: Robert Backhaus <robbak@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20050831050137.GQ77007@decibel.org>
References: <55023220@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
	<20050828150947.GA58038@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl>
	<4312B091.9090104@meijome.net>
	<d449958050829175712f309f3@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d449958050829175712f309f3@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p10 i386
X-Distributed: Join the Effort!  http://www.distributed.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
Subject: Re: 6.0 and -O2 option
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:01:41 -0000

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote:
> > > Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is
> > -O2 not advised for ports on 6.0?
> > cheers,
> > Beto
> 
> Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused
> bad code in some circumstances.

Is there an automated way to identify those ports so they can be forced
not to use -O higer than -O1?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"