Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:01:37 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> To: Robert Backhaus <robbak@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> Subject: Re: 6.0 and -O2 option Message-ID: <20050831050137.GQ77007@decibel.org> In-Reply-To: <d449958050829175712f309f3@mail.gmail.com> References: <55023220@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20050828150947.GA58038@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl> <4312B091.9090104@meijome.net> <d449958050829175712f309f3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote: > > > Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised. > > > > Hi, > > I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is > > -O2 not advised for ports on 6.0? > > cheers, > > Beto > > Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused > bad code in some circumstances. Is there an automated way to identify those ports so they can be forced not to use -O higer than -O1? -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050831050137.GQ77007>