From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 19 7:56:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (ppp14-net1-idf3-bas1.isdnet.net [195.154.52.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0503D37B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:56:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org) Received: by melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E463F24D02; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:56:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:56:03 +0100 From: Thomas Quinot To: Nat Lanza Cc: thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI-over-* hacks Message-ID: <20010319165603.A95194@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> Reply-To: thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org References: <20010319151134.A89803@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from magus@cs.cmu.edu on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:47:25AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Le 2001-03-19, Nat Lanza écrivait : > FreeBSD already has an equivalent to the SCSI generic device -- take a > look at pass(4). Yep, I am aware of pass(4), but some closed-source software that comes only as Linux binaries insist on having a /dev/sg device (which, under FreeBSD, would most likely be implemented as a wrapper around pass.) > As far as ATAPI-over-CAM, there's been some discussion of having ATA > become part of CAM, but I don't remember what the result of it > was. You might want to check the list archives. Thanks, I'll do that. Thomas. -- Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message