From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 06:36:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616DF16A407 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from outbound0.mx.meer.net (outbound0.mx.meer.net [209.157.153.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D98413C4E5 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.mx.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m1L6ap7t081335; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:36:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail2.meer.net (mail2.meer.net [64.13.141.16]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id m1L6aajD035375; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:36:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (61.204.211.246.customerlink.pwd.ne.jp [61.204.211.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail2.meer.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1L6aZMX034309; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:36:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:36:34 +0900 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <47BC7081.1060205@incunabulum.net> References: <47BC7081.1060205@incunabulum.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.1.50 (i386-apple-darwin8.10.1) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD-Net mailing list Subject: Re: IPV6_TCLASS missing from ip6(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:36:59 -0000 At Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:25:05 +0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > I just noticed that whilst the socket code appears to support > IPV6_TCLASS, we don't document it. > > I haven't raised a PR for this issue yet nor have I written a patch. > Please do both :-) Thanks, George