From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 4 12:44: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from w2xo.pgh.pa.us (18.gibs5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.184.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E78637B405 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:44:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from there (pgh.nepinc.com [192.204.162.27]) by w2xo.pgh.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.3) with SMTP id fB4LARW37947; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:10:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us) Message-Id: <200112042110.fB4LARW37947@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jim Durham To: Jordan Hubbard , Jim Durham Subject: Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4? Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:43:54 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <21984.1007486225@winston.freebsd.org> <200112042040.fB4Keb514245@pgh.nepinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200112042040.fB4Keb514245@pgh.nepinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 04 December 2001 03:40 pm, Jim Durham wrote: > On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:17 pm, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4, > > > but > > > > You mean RELENG_4_4 I assume. RELENG_4 gets a lot more than just > > security fixes. > > > > - Jordan > > Duh... right. OGS..(Old Guy Syndrome). I actually just did a cvsup > to RELENG_4_4 and it didn't have the fixes. I guess I'll rephrase > my question... "Can we have the patches in REGENG_4_4?". > > I put them in by hand and they looked like they were OK, but I > haven't compiled a kernel yet. > > -Jim OK... ONE MORE TIME 8-) RELENG_4_4 not "REGENG" as above... sigh.. (I'm going over in the corner now) -Jim -- Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message