From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Sep 24 11:50:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B349637B413 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f8OIoBO34859; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109241850.f8OIoBO34859@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Joe Abley Subject: Re: misc/30792: traffic destined for 127/8 addresses should be kept off the network Reply-To: Joe Abley Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/30792; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Joe Abley To: "Scot W. Hetzel" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/30792: traffic destined for 127/8 addresses should be kept off the network Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:43:51 -0400 On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:40:27PM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > Another alternative to patching rc.network, is to define static_routes and > add route_loopback to etc/defaults/rc.conf (see attached patch). > > We may also need do this for IPv6's loopback network. That's a nicer idea than my patch. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message