From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 13 05:30:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0805BF11 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7580B2F for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id r1D5UhaY025843; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:30:43 GMT (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.143] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id mi87h3zxx2ezhyifw9ax6yzc2s; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: building RaspPi Images Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <5F763292-2EA4-426A-B84A-8DE533BA6308@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:30:43 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5116CB50.9080303@ceetonetechnology.com> <7757848F-45C6-4DEF-A4A2-5F900EB10A06@kientzle.com> <20130210012052.4d7e1a46@ivory.local> <58DCA6BE-8C06-4F69-81A2-A3582FBB5B12@kientzle.com> <1360598511.4545.92.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <1360600007.4545.98.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <3F4CD7E5-17D4-4315-86BD-605F5C0040DC@kientzle.com> <1360604561.4545.115.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <72554169-D2DD-48DD-8C2F-6C411DBFCE4D@kientzle.com> <25EAEA1F-876A-4189-BCD4-A7D438332C11@kientzle.com> <5F763292-2EA4-426A-B84A-8DE533BA6308@bsdimp.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:30:47 -0000 On Feb 12, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > But it doesn't have all the pin group stuff in yet, so I'll have to = chase that down and see what happened to that part of the early patches = I was reviewing=85 I would be interested in seeing those early patches. I agree that it would be best to bundle pinmux info with the related device in the FDT. Seeing some prior art would help a lot. Tim