From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Nov 18 11:15:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA22107 for freebsd-alpha-outgoing; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 11:15:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zephyr.cybercom.net (zephyr.cybercom.net [209.21.146.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA22096 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 11:15:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rhuff@cybercom.net) Received: from shell1.cybercom.net (rhuff@shell1.cybercom.net [209.21.136.6]) by zephyr.cybercom.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA27413 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 14:15:01 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rhuff@localhost) by shell1.cybercom.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA05369; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 14:15:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 14:15:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199811181915.OAA05369@shell1.cybercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Robert Huff To: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ALPHA stuff on 3.0 CD X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 20.3 "Vatican City" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello: I just got my 3.0 CD set ... tracked down the Alpha stuff (it's on disk 4) and ... as far as I can tell, all of the top-level docs are copied verbatim from the i386 section. Not that I was expecting a complete work-up (given, among other things, the rate of code development) but I would prefer no docs to useless/frivolous docs. Is anybody co-ordinating the delivery of Alpha material? Also - how out-of-date are the various sources? They're labeled "Oct 17". Robert Huff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message