Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:54:45 +0200
From:      Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com>
To:        Nikolay Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Jails on fib problem
Message-ID:  <CAPSTskts0%2Bc%2BaWE7CbFKMBnHU=NG78TKRU8dA-AFUgzaJ1u7_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BP_MZFZ8Ue46VZOkG9sL2X_KqyXQZZb7B5z2Mm%2Br%2Bxca6UUPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1390909590119-5880672.post@n5.nabble.com> <52E7A9D8.30604@freebsd.org> <CAPSTskviFBMHUXmWhTnGB13ZEYsyQm2_azHNJ65VG42oQLpmpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BP_MZFZ8Ue46VZOkG9sL2X_KqyXQZZb7B5z2Mm%2Br%2Bxca6UUPQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You can't use 127/8 addresses and expect them to be routed/forwarded.
> See rfc1122.
> --Nikolay

Thank you very much Nikolay. To correct the setup, I could
a. Remove  fib-1 thus placing everything on fib-0 and jail IP's remain
at 127/32 or
b. Migrate jails and fib-1 to a 192.168 range.
Will I have various problems if I try to reconfigure as described in (a) ?
Regards



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPSTskts0%2Bc%2BaWE7CbFKMBnHU=NG78TKRU8dA-AFUgzaJ1u7_g>