From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 3 15:01:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DE3DD2 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40008FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.22] (c-67-180-208-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.208.218]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC7D61A3C1D; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <509531DF.6050108@mu.org> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 08:01:51 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alie Tan Subject: Re: DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:01:52 -0000 On 11/3/12 6:18 AM, Alie Tan wrote: > Hi, > > No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality. > > What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far > behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/ Looks like a few specific benchmarks that DragonFly aimed to do well at that we were unawares of. Not sure, didn't see DragonFly sharing the results with us until this paper was published although I may have missed that. -Alfred