From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 20 13:13:49 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA17620 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 13:13:49 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA17615 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 13:13:46 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA05181; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 13:06:46 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199510202006.NAA05181@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: netwirk interface setup To: mrami@minerva.cis.yale.edu Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 13:06:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Marc Ramirez" at Oct 20, 95 00:14:58 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 687 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > My machine is 130.132.57.207. Currently if I send a packet to > 130.132.57.207, it goes over sl0 over the modem, bounces at the router, > and comes back over the modem to me. How should I set up my routing > tables, etc, so that packets to 130.132.57.207 go over a loopback > interface? Or is this just not standard practice? Add a non-default route for the specific addresses/nets that you wish to have treated as local. Only packs to the default route (which I assume is on the other side of the SLIP link) will be sent over the link. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.