From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 11 15:12:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA15248 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 15:12:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from catastrophe.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (fw-line-106.fwi.com [209.84.172.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA15241 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 15:12:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) Received: from emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us [10.23.42.2]) by catastrophe.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA24320 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 17:10:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) Received: (from croyle@localhost) by emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA09677; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 17:10:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Updating p5-* ports for perl-5.005_01 Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Don Croyle Date: 11 Aug 1998 17:10:41 -0500 Organization: Minimal at best Message-ID: <867m0fmaou.fsf@emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us> Lines: 6 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.20/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Should I go ahead and send in patches to make the p5-* ports I maintain work with perl-5.005_01, or is there going to be a Grand Unified Fix in the next few days that would make that a waste of time? -- I've always wanted to be a dilettante, but I've never quite been ready to make the commitment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message