Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:22:20 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Da Rock <freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: libreoffice-3.4.5.2 failing to build
Message-ID:  <20120330062219.GA49266@azathoth.lan>
In-Reply-To: <4F73E0F5.6080304@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <4F71A789.3030502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F73E0F5.6080304@herveybayaustralia.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:11:33PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote:
> > I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I=20
> > keep running into is the previous versions failings... :(
> >
> > I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build=20
> > errors qa testing(?) sd. I followed the instructions, but it still=20
> > failed. It spits out this:
> >
> > scripting deliver
> > deliver -- version: 275594
> > module 'scripting' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 28 files=20
> > unchanged
> > terminate called after throwing an instance of=20
> > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
> > /usr/local/bin/bash: line 1: 2019 Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
> > [ a whole lot of code (I'm copying by hand, so it is a bit=20
> > overwhelming) - involving clone/impress/sd/unxfbsd.pro, solver, and=20
> > qa_unit ]
> > dmake: Error code 134, while making 'test'
> > gb_LinkTarget_add_library_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,sc
> > gb_LinkTarget_add_linktarget_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,Li=
brary/libscfb.so=20
> >
> > [ build all ] top level modules: sc
> > [ build all ] loaded modules: sc
> > [ build cut ] sc_ucalc
> > Abort trap (core dumped)
> > terminate called after throwing an instance of=20
> > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
> > gmake[1]: ***=20
> > [/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/solv=
er/340/unxfbsd.pro/workdir/CppunitTest/sc_ucalc.test]=20
> > Error 1
> > dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all'
> > [ build all ] top level modules: sw
> > [ build all ] loaded modules: sw
> > [ build all ] loaded modules: sw
> > [ build log ] sw
> > sw deliver
> > deliver -- version: 275594
> > Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1 files unchanged
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > [ standard error message with webpage link to debug page ]
> >
> > internal build errors:
> >
> > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making=20
> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sd/qa=
/unit
> > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making=20
> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sc/prj
> >
> > [ instructions to build sd part of the build to isolate the issue ]
> >
> > As I mentioned I followed the directions and still hit the same error=
=20
> > filed above (if more of the data is needed I guess I'll have to find a=
=20
> > way to post it...).
> >
> > I'm on a deadline for this one, so I have to get this to work. How=20
> > should I further debug this to fix it? Or failing that (as an extreme=
=20
> > last resort), will an older package already built work IF it is built=
=20
> > for 8.2?
> After a portsnap update I still get core dumps in the=20
> calc/sc/cppunittester and the impress/sd/qa/unit/cppunittester.
>=20
> I've tried turning off make jobs, and I also checked the core files=20
> (when I finally found them). The only clue I have is this:
>=20
> #0 0x00000008016bca7c in ??
>=20
> This is in _both_ core files, and although its not very helpful it says=
=20
> its stopping in exactly the same place (duh).
>=20
> Seriously guys, where do I go from here? Googling isn't exactly offering=
=20
> up much - my searches can be as much as 7 results (usually my own stuff=
=20
> or duplicates of the same).
>=20
> Or, as my last resort, can I use the 8.2 package instead?
>=20
> Need some serious pointers, pleeease... :)

is you 9.0-RELEASE a freshly built system? or installed installed from
installers or upgraded?

regards,
Bapt

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk91URsACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex10ACfTMYjqX9ZdSSisGuNPbmfnC+0
CSUAoIakwb6ubpyQIqiDaPjxvVPok6Xw
=cy3/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120330062219.GA49266>