From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 15 14:43:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E733E16A4CE; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:43:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A766343D4C; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:43:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD))
	id 1D13vC-0001Ai-JP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:43:26 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:43:26 +0100
From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050215144326.GC2428@voodoo.oberon.net>
References: <200502150905.j1F95axw000902@sanne.nlnetlabs.nl>
	<Pine.GSO.4.43.0502150939550.26566-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0502150939550.26566-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon
X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE
Keywords: 579279786
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Ted Lindgreen <ted@sanne.nlnetlabs.nl>
Subject: Re: few programs now getting sig 6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:43:33 -0000

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:41:25AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> You can try backing out the increase stacksize change I committed
> yesterday to libpthread...  I didn't have any problem testing it
> here.

Backout helped here also.

-Kirill