From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 29 00:35:14 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE431065675
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6917E158CC4;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:35:04 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4ED428B8.8040909@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:35:04 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <66539.1322526789@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <66539.1322526789@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>,
	Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net>
Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:35:14 -0000

On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4ED4222E.5010707@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>> On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
> 
>>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>>> default?
>>
>> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
>> system for at least a decade.
>>
>> Ideally we could do this for 9.0.
> 
> Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so
> that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ?

I think WITH_PROFILE is probably a good idea for the tinderbox?


-- 

		"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
		"Too practical."

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/