From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 11 14:19:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B912716D; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.70.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933C61A08; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6E699CB8C9F; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:19:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:19:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <33315.128.135.70.2.1434032344.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <55799538.2000009@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150610111135.C81EE2319B@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150610165244.0c6f2ed7.freebsd@edvax.de> <1507965.zgzlHR604A@thinkpad> <20150611125414.6ec3c597.freebsd@edvax.de> <557988D8.6020108@hiwaay.net> <55799538.2000009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:19:04 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Docker From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Matthew Seaman" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:19:10 -0000 On Thu, June 11, 2015 9:03 am, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/06/2015 09:10, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> Hmmmmm .... interesting read. One of the reasons I am migrating to *BSD >> is the presumed absence of malevolent gov't involvement (*cough* SELinux >> *cough*), I thought the BSD's were mostly/entirely free from such, no ? > > Pretty sure that there aren't any NSA agents in deep cover who have > managed to become FreeBSD committers -- not that I have any way of > telling for sure of course. To the contrary to OpenBSD which allegedly had that sort of trouble: http://slashdot.org/story/10/12/15/004235/FBI-Alleged-To-Have-Backdoored-OpenBSDs-IPSEC-Stack Well, I didn't say had, I said allegedly had... Valeri > > Certainly FreeBSD relies on openness as the best guarantee that the OS > we're shipping is free from backdoors, trojans and the like. You've got > access to the source code and the build system so you can (in principle) > review everything you build and dyke out anything you don't like. Of > course, it's a tall order to expect everyone to have the skills to be > able to do that. Consequently, internally we're strongly advocating a > culture of routine code-review before making any commits, but > particularly to any sensitive areas of the kernel. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++