Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Apr 2006 20:43:42 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
To:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: extreme mem usage under amd64 arch ?
Message-ID:  <20060408104342.GA720@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200604081021.k38ALkR1094733@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <2fd864e0604072236p2ee54649ld9d328f429005d6a@mail.gmail.com> <200604081021.k38ALkR1094733@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2006-Apr-08 12:21:46 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I suspect a python kernel would be painfully slow.......
>
>Certainly.  I wasn't implying that Python would be well-
>suited to write an OS kernel in.  Unless someone builds
>a processor that executes Python bytecode natively.

Squeak (a smalltalk dialect) has its kernel written in a subset of
squeak which can be either interpreted or compiled into assembler.
The former maintains the development/testing advantages of an
interpreter and the latter makes it run at a decent speed.  You may be
able to do the same with Python.  Alternatively, JIT techniques have
received an enormous amount of effort over the past decade (thanks to
Java) and a JIT Python may be reasonable.

>   Oliver  (right now busy writing a boot manager in assembler)

Not Python?? :-)

-- 
Peter Jeremy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060408104342.GA720>