From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 5 14:04:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA08616 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:04:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA08562 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:04:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rkw@dataplex.net) Received: from [208.2.87.7] (user10.dataplex.net [208.2.87.10]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA09712; Tue, 5 May 1998 16:01:54 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <334.894393164@critter.freebsd.dk> References: Your message of "Tue, 05 May 1998 17:52:15 +0200." <19980505175215.A3650@klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 16:01:16 -0500 To: Poul-Henning Kamp From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: should we update xntp in the base system to newest ntp version ? Cc: Andreas Klemm , current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 1:32 PM -0500 5/5/98, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >In message <19980505175215.A3650@klemm.gtn.com>, Andreas Klemm writes: > >I think we should wait for 4.X to mature a little bit and then go >that route. > >But a port of version 4.x would be nice. (hint! hint!) What about a contrib, but left out of the parent's Makefile, instead? I am already running it in that form w/o problems. (But I don't have the gear to test all the clocks. That way it would be in place and easy for those who want it. BTW, I advocate the same for dhcp2. I had to move it to "contrib" status to fold it into my dhcp-configured startup. Richard Wackerbarth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message