Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:34:08 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: "Wall, Stephen" <stephen.wall@redcom.com>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, sirdice@gmail.com Subject: Re: p5-DBD-mysql: Stuck between a rock and a hard place Message-ID: <e5bd4823-92e1-d55f-7d9e-6ffce4705d6e@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <MW4PR09MB928423EF8C58E3E8E02D653BEE362@MW4PR09MB9284.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> References: <CAHNAqm_uZiirkwSuOw2YZCq%2BJykaxX%2ByiimefCfir2QJE8HjmQ@mail.gmail.com> <MW4PR09MB928423EF8C58E3E8E02D653BEE362@MW4PR09MB9284.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
26.03.2024 3:37, Wall, Stephen wrote: > There is a third option. > Create both p5-DBD-mysql4 and p5-DBD-mysql5 using the respective versions, and turn p5-DBD-mysql into a meta-port that uses DEFAULT_VERSIONS to select one of the two numbered ports. There is precedent for this in the current ports tree, but I can’t comment on how well it works or if it solves any of your problems. I like this. Besides, I suggest adding flavours for noted meta-port so that our cluster would build ready-to-install packages for both variants.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e5bd4823-92e1-d55f-7d9e-6ffce4705d6e>