Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:46:29 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Multi-Port Async Cards
Message-ID:  <199601292046.NAA04395@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199601290025.BAA05001@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jan 29, 96 01:25:02 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > If the machine crashes, getty goes away (the POST state on a proper serial
> > port is to not assert DTR), and so the modems are not answered.
> 
> Hung machines (processes are alive, but context-switch hangs) cause
> the modem to pick up the line, but nothing happens.
> 
> Despite of this, i'm still not yet convinced that mgetty is the better
> solution. :)

A full process table and active mgetty's have the same effect.

A bogus shared library and the use of a dynamically linked shell have
the same effect.

A corrupt shell binary has the same effect.

An improper modem setting (improper for mgetty) has the same effect.

A lightning hit on a modem has the same effect.


If you have a buggered configuration, it is irrelevant how it got that
way, only that it IS.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601292046.NAA04395>