From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 10 14:43:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84FFFD6; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62E0259; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 076E0B94C; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:43:13 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" Subject: Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:16:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p25; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <229402991.20130407172016@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru> <55881.1365577455@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <55881.1365577455@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304101016.57894.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:43:13 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Adrian Chadd , lev@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:43:13 -0000 On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:04:15 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov writ > es: > >Hello, Poul-Henning. > >You wrote 10 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2013 =E3., 0:52:04: > > > >>> Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each > >>> other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we > >>> need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now > >>> about several UARTs. Something like "multiport" device, bot not > >>> exactly. > >PHK> That is what the puc(4) driver does... > > Yes, for PCI devices only :( > > Yes, it needs to learn to do it from hints for ISA. No, that is that not the right hammer for this. This isn't a single ISA device with two ports (which is what puc(4) is aimed at). -- John Baldwin