From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 3 16:42:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA16255 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 16:42:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA16247 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 16:42:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14882; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 11:11:53 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199811030302.MAA01789@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 11:11:53 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Kazutaka YOKOTA Subject: Re: kld screensavers Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Mikael Karpberg Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 03-Nov-98 Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > I am not sure if we want to have this kind of screen saver stack. It > will complicate things a lot: multiple saver module management, > priority management, flag checking... Is this worth the effort? It depends how complicated it is to implement. If it works, then hooray, but if its too hard, then a 'normal' system would be OK.. Besides which, its a neat idea, and would give a good example of code for other people to use :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message