From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 04:55:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6B516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:55:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp804.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp804.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30E1443D1D for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.26.30 with login) by smtp804.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2004 04:55:49 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:55:46 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200412282034.11149.ringworm@inbox.lv> In-Reply-To: <200412282034.11149.ringworm@inbox.lv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412282055.46838.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: desktop-file-utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:55:49 -0000 On Tuesday 28 December 2004 08:34 pm, "Michael C. Shultz" wrote: > I get the following error when trying to deinstall > desktop-file-utils: > > root@ringworm:/usr/ports/devel/desktop-file-utils#make deinstall > ===> Deinstalling for devel/desktop-file-utils > ===> Deinstalling desktop-file-utils-0.10 > ===> desktop-file-utils-0.9 has a different PREFIX: /usr/X11R6, > skipping > root@ringworm:/usr/ports/devel/desktop-file-utils# > > I have no idea what is causing this, do you? Yes, the 0.10 version installs the binary in ${LOCALBASE}/bin , which is /usr/local/bin , instead of ${X11BASE}/bin , which is /usr/X11R6/bin/. I'm not sure why it's not finding it correctly in your case, as it will deinstall for me. Maybe your pkgdb isn't correct. Maybe try pkgdb -F. This change has caused some problems (not sure if the change were intentional), specifically with gimp, and I sent a patch to the list for that earlier. The patch solves the problem for gimp, but I'm not sure that desktop-file-utils is supposed to be installing in LOCALBASE. > Also I think going from version 0.9 to 0.10 is actually going > backwards, probably should have gone from 0.09 to 0.10, and maybe you > are going to need to set PORTEPOCH=1 ? Not sure ... - jt