Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:34:18 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPI4 clock speeds and serial port Message-ID: <20210318213418.GC26853@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <5F3752C0-F984-48CE-BA05-526A0C37C1FF@yahoo.com> References: <20210318170053.GA26688@www.zefox.net> <YFONu3Ry0o6VlV92@ceres.zyxst.net> <20210318180736.GA26853@www.zefox.net> <5F3752C0-F984-48CE-BA05-526A0C37C1FF@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:14:07PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > You are correct that the mini-UART has the dependencies. > But use of: > > dtoverlay=disable-bt > > avoids use of the mini-UART. The same is true > of instead using: > > dtoverlay=miniuart-bt > > but, then, Bluetooth suffers the variability. > (I just do not try to use Bluetooth.) > This clears up my confusion. Bluetooth is of no immediate use to me, is there any prospect FreeBSD will ever support it? DB's suggestion to speed-correct the mini-uart seems like a good idea unless there are some bad side effects. Thank you! bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210318213418.GC26853>