From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 19 18:07:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49BF106566B;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC9D8FC0C;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:07:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.23] (ip-78-102-160-251.net.upcbroadband.cz
	[78.102.160.251]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3JI7qeB057418;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:07:54 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: Rene Ladan <rene@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DACC5A9.4000905@freebsd.org>
References: <201104182225.p3IMPf67065746@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4DACC5A9.4000905@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-V4pql+vFCP5ttvxqpPTC"
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:07:02 +0200
Message-ID: <1303236422.17572.2.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135
X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 78.102.160.251;
	Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; )
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports LEGAL MOVED ports/cad Makefile        
 ports/cad/tclspice Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist        
 ports/cad/tclspice/files patch-src_Makefile.am patch-src_frontend_aspice.c 
 patch-src_frontend_parser_complete.c patch-src_frontend_resource.c
 patch-src_frontend_subckt.c ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:07:09 -0000


--=-V4pql+vFCP5ttvxqpPTC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rene Ladan p=ED=B9e v =FAt 19. 04. 2011 v 01:13 +0200:

> In general, can people who tag ports as expired make sure that their
> changes do not break INDEX ?

By definition they don't. Also rmport checks for this as I heard.

--=20
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>
EMACS: Eight Megabytes And Continually Swapping

--=-V4pql+vFCP5ttvxqpPTC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAk2tz0YACgkQntdYP8FOsoIsQACeLH00qs6QNTvHSCJG5CGeoSWV
Ac0An1Jbz8H+aCt3ekjK81htci/o8dTB
=x7VS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-V4pql+vFCP5ttvxqpPTC--